Page 1 of 1

Bypass processor function doesn't work

Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2019 9:56 pm
by crispyjones
First, thanks for releasing 1.0 for testing. I've installed it on my test machine and imported workflows without issue. I have a workflow that encodes Youtube video to MXF with a branch I used for some bug testing. It has a Folder delivery processor I use to make a copy of the direct output of the youtube processor for troubleshooting issues (silent audio) it also appends 'direct' to the output of the file so I can locate it easily. The folder delivery processor has bypass processor checked and is grayed out but the processor definitely runs in spite of this, I am certain because I end up with two files, one is the final output and the other has 'direct' added to the end of the name.

Re: Bypass processor function doesn't work

Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 7:51 pm
by admin
Hi crispyjones, thanks for reporting! :-)

Could you please export and post your workflow? If it's sensitive you can send it on private message or remove/replace the sensitive parts.

-steinar

Re: Bypass processor function doesn't work

Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 9:11 pm
by crispyjones
It looks like 1.0 exports in the json format which gets flagged as a invalid file type for upload. I changed the extension to .txt and that seemed to work.

Re: Bypass processor function doesn't work

Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 9:46 pm
by admin
Thanks,

I'm not able to reproduce the issue, neither by creating manually a new similar workflow or using yours. Could you please right-click on the job in the status-monitor and select "Open log folder", zip all the content and post it?

And yeah, the new format for saving and exporting is json and that's what you get from an export. This will not change. I will see if it's possible to open up for posting .json in this forum. Thanks :-)

-steinar

Re: Bypass processor function doesn't work

Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 10:21 pm
by crispyjones
Log file attached. I tried unchecking "bypass processor" saving the workflow and then checking it again, but I still get two files. I may try creating the workflow from scratch in 1.0 later.

Re: Bypass processor function doesn't work

Posted: Wed Dec 04, 2019 8:09 pm
by admin
Thanks for the log files and for reporting! I have found and corrected the bug. New beta will hopefully be released tomorrow.

-steinar

Re: Bypass processor function doesn't work

Posted: Wed Dec 04, 2019 10:57 pm
by crispyjones
Thank you :D

Re: Bypass processor function doesn't work

Posted: Thu Dec 05, 2019 8:07 pm
by admin
New beta 3 out now. Should fix the issue.

-steinar

Re: Bypass processor function doesn't work

Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2019 4:43 pm
by crispyjones
Updated to latest beta and the bypass processor function behaves as expected. That bug is squashed. Thank you.